KleverooKleveroo
Join Game

Unit 5: Assess vs Evaluate Showdown

Community · Mixed · 20–30 min

Know someone who’d like this game?

Share your screen so everyone can see the board. Use the +/− buttons to award or deduct the tile's points.

About This Board

This board helps players review Curriculum Evaluation through a Jeopardy-style game format on Kleveroo. It includes categories such as Assessment vs Evaluation Basics, Tyler's Objectives-Based Model, Stufflebeam's CIPP Model, Stake's Countenance (Responsive), Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation. It is useful for classroom review, team trivia, family game night, test prep, and group play.

Best For

Questions in this game

A peek at what's on the board — 5 categories and one sample clue from each. Answers stay hidden until you open them, so the game still works.

  • Assessment vs Evaluation Basics

    Curriculum assessment primarily focuses on this, measured against learning objectives.

    Show answer

    student learning

    +4 more clues in this category

  • Tyler's Objectives-Based Model

    This model evaluates the extent to which stated educational objectives have been achieved.

    Show answer

    Tyler's Objectives-Based Model

    +4 more clues in this category

  • Stufflebeam's CIPP Model

    In CIPP, the P at the end stands for this.

    Show answer

    Product

    +4 more clues in this category

  • Stake's Countenance (Responsive)

    This model is also known as Responsive Evaluation.

    Show answer

    Stake's Countenance Model

    +4 more clues in this category

  • Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation

    In this approach, evaluators assess without knowing stated objectives.

    Show answer

    Goal-Free Evaluation

    +4 more clues in this category

Board content

Assessment vs Evaluation Basics

$100 — Curriculum assessment primarily focuses on this, measured against learning objectives.
student learning
$200 — Assessment serves both 'assessment for learning' and 'assessment of learning.'
formative and summative
$300 — This process judges the overall worth, effectiveness, and impact of the curriculum as a program.
curriculum evaluation
$400 — These are the primary beneficiaries of assessment for feedback and instructional planning.
students and teachers
$500 — These data often trigger curriculum review when scores are low across a subject.
assessment findings

Tyler's Objectives-Based Model

$100 — This model evaluates the extent to which stated educational objectives have been achieved.
Tyler's Objectives-Based Model
$200 — The first step in Tyler’s process is to formulate these.
clear objectives
$300 — A noted weakness of Tyler’s model is that it can be this, missing unanticipated outcomes.
too narrow
$400 — The final step compares student performance to these.
objectives
$500 — An alternate name for Tyler’s model given in the lesson.
Discrepancy Model

Stufflebeam's CIPP Model

$100 — In CIPP, the P at the end stands for this.
Product
$200 — Context focuses on the prompt about goals, needs, problems, and environment: 'What needs to be done'.
What needs to be done?
$300 — Input examines these key elements such as resources and strategies.
resources and strategies
$400 — Process checks this aspect to see if implementation matches the plan.
implementation fidelity
$500 — CIPP is a comprehensive, decision-oriented model providing information for this.
decision-making

Stake's Countenance (Responsive)

$100 — This model is also known as Responsive Evaluation.
Stake's Countenance Model
$200 — In description, it notes antecedents, transactions, and these.
outcomes
$300 — It emphasizes being responsive to this group's information needs.
the audience
$400 — A strength is rich, this type of data collection capturing multiple perspectives.
qualitative data
$500 — A weakness is that findings can be this, making generalization difficult.
subjective

Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation

$100 — In this approach, evaluators assess without knowing stated objectives.
Goal-Free Evaluation
$200 — It seeks to uncover all actual effects, both intended and this.
unintended
$300 — A key strength is revealing unanticipated these.
side effects
$400 — A noted drawback is that the approach is this in terms of required resources.
resource-intensive
$500 — The lesson’s example has an external evaluator assess this type of program in a Cabanatuan elementary school.
healthy eating program

Kleveroo is an online review game platform for teachers, teams, and families. Create Jeopardy-style boards, host live trivia, and play educational games — no PowerPoint templates required.

Related Boards

Find more like this

More General Knowledge boardscurriculum evaluationassessment vs evaluation basicstyler s objectives-based modelstufflebeam s cipp model
Play this board·Remix it

Like this game? Create your own with our free Jeopardy game maker.

More General Knowledge boards·Browse all boards·Community boards